Published on:

With Motion for Summary Judgment Pending Against It, Plaintiff Requests District Court to Order Parties to Mediation and District Court Grants Summary Judgment Motion Instead

Princeton Digital Image Corp. (“Princeton Digital”) filed a patent infringement action against Hewlett-Packard and Hewlett Packard filed a summary judgment motion. With the summary judgment motion pending, Princeton Digital filed a letter with the district court requesting that the district court order a mediation between the parties pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9.

The district court also received a letter from Hewlett-Packard opposing Princeton Digital’s mediation request, arguing that their outstanding motion for summary judgment should be determined first.

The district court sided with Hewlett-Packard and declined to order the parties to conduct a mediation pursuant to the Local Rules. First, the district court found that the pending motions were fully briefed. Second, the district court stated that having considered the parties’ submissions on the summary judgment motion, the district court intended to grant the defendants’ summary judgment motion. The district court further explained that it would explain its reasons in a written opinion to come later.

As a result, the district court denied the Princeton Digital’s request for an order to mediate.

Princeton Digital Image Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard, Case No. 1:02-cv-00779-RJS (Dec. 9, 2014)

The authors of are patent trial lawyers at Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP. We represent inventors, patent owners and technology companies in patent licensing and litigation. Whether pursuing patent violations or defending infringement claims, we are aggressive and effective advocates for our clients. For more information contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or