After the district court found that defendant’s electronic control device literally infringed certain claims of a patent owned by Taser and denied defendant’s summary judgment motion on defendant’s claims of invalidity and unenforceability, Taser filed a motion for contempt and an application for an order to show cause. In its…
Articles Posted by Stan Gibson
The Battle over Android, Oracle v. Google: Court Allows Third Chance for Oracle’s Damage Expert to Take a Bite out of Google But Makes Oracle Pay for the Chance
In the ongoing saga over Oracle’s lawsuit against Google, the district court has allowed Oracle’s damage expert another chance to fix its damage report. The district court had previously stricken Oracle’s damage expert report on two previous occasions but allowed Oracle’s damage expert a third chance. Before addressing the damage…
Court Sinks Two Moms and a Toy’s Attempt to Modify Expert Schedule in Patent Battle over Bath Toy
Plaintiff, Two Moms and a Toy, filed an emergency motion to stay the expert phase of their case pending the court’s ruling on claim construction. The plaintiff’s motion was based on the argument that “expert reports and expert discovery in a patent infringement case is extremely expensive and that a…
Microsoft and Google Strike Back: Declaratory Judgment Action Remains in Delaware Even Though Defendant Had Sued 450 Microsoft and Google Customers in Texas
Microsoft and Google sued Geotag in the District of Delaware for a declaration that their customers did not infringe a Geotag patent, “Internet Organizer for Accessing Geographically and Topically Based Information,” and that the patent was invalid. Geotag had sued in excess of 450 companies in the Eastern District of…
Motion to Dismiss Granted Where Complaint Failed to Allege That One Party Performed Each Step of Method Claim
Defendants moved to dismiss a patent infringement complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the theory that the complaint failed to allege facts showing that a single party performed each and every limitation of the method claim. The district court noted that “the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has ‘instructed that…
The Battle over Android: Google Succeeds in Striking Oracle’s Damage Expert for Conducting a Patent-By-Patent Analysis Instead of a Claim-By-Claim Analysis
Oracle’s damage expert was directed to submit a substitute expert report after his original report was excluded on a motion by Google because it failed to apportion the value of the asserted claims and instead used a total value of Java and Android in calculating damages. The substitute damages report…
Motion to Dismiss Denied Where Claim for Joint Infringement Was Not At Issue in Complaint
Plaintiff Intertainer, Inc. brought an action for patent infringement against Defendant Hulu, LLC. Hulu moved to dismiss Intertainer’s first amended complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In the first amended complaint, Intertainer alleged infringement of a patent entitled, “Method for Interactive Video Contention Programming,” which according to the district court, “relates…
Downstream Distributors’ Request for Stay of Litigation Denied Where Stay Would Interfere with Plaintiff’s Ability to Effectively Litigate
Plaintiff Internet Machines LLC (“iMac”) filed a patent infringement action against several defendants including, among others, PLX Technology, Inc., ASUS Computer International and CDW Corp. alleging infringement of three patents that pertain to PCI Express switches. PLX manufactures the accused products while the remaining defendants distribute the products, incorporate the…
Lost Profits Claim Dismissed Where Plaintiff Did Not Provide Sufficient Evidence to Support the Entire Market Value Rule in Opposing Summary Judgment
Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on lost profits challenging plaintiff’s use of the entire market value rule. Defendant contended that plaintiff had not presented sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the entire market value rule. Plaintiff asserted that the defendant was misapplying the entire market value…
Defense Attorneys Disqualified for Hiring Plaintiffs’ Trial Technician from a Previous Case Involving the Same Patents
Plaintiff Tyco Healthcare Group and United States Surgical Corporation moved to disqualify defendant Ethicon Endo-Surgery’s attorneys of record (the law firm of Akin Gump). Tyco based the motion to disqualify on the ground that Akin Gump had improper access to privileged and confidential information of Tyco because Akin Gump hired…