National Products, Inc. (“NPI”) filed a patent infringement action Akron Resources, Inc. (“Akron”), among others. The parties filed several cross motions for summary judgment, including a motion for summary judgment based on the failure to mark. As explained by the district court, the parties did not dispute that: “1) NPI…
Patent Lawyer Blog
District Court Quashes Deposition Notices Where Notices Did Not Take into Account Travel Time between States
In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff, Whirlpool Properties (“Whirlpool”) noticed several depositions of third-party witnesses near the discovery cut-off. The defendant, Filters Fast, moved for an order to stop the depositions. As explained by the district court, “[t]he crux of the pending motion is that the Whirlpool Plaintiffs emailed…
JMBM Ranked as Metropolitan Tier 1 “Best Law Firm” in 2019 by U.S. News & World Report for Patent Litigation
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP (JMBM) is proud to announce it has been ranked as an Orange County Metropolitan Tier 1 2019 “Best Law Firm” for Patent Litigation. This distinction was announced by the national publication U.S. News & World Report. The “Best Law Firms” annual announcement of the…
Karl Storz v. Sryker: District Court Strikes Infringement Expert Who Provided No Analysis of Infringement
In this patent infringement action, Stryker moved to strike the expert report of Karl Storz’ (“KSEA”) infringement expert because the expert did not provide any analysis of infringement of the patent-in-suit. As explained by the district court, Karl Storz’ infringement expert’s, Mr. Gould Bear, report included six sections: (1) introduction,…
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Requiring Defendant to Stop Inter Partes Review at Patent Office Because of Forum Selection Clause
The plaintiff Dodocase VR, Inc. filed a motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction against Defendants MerchSource, LLC (“MerchSource”) and ThreeSixty Brands Group LLC (“ThreeSixty”) (together, “Defendants”) requesting that the court order the Defendants to withdraw certain petitions filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB Petitions”).…
Ericsson v. TCL: District Court Tosses Out Damage Theory Based on Improper Use of Survey
During a jury trial, Ericsson asserted that TCL infringed claims 1 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 7,149,510 (the “‘510 Patent”) by selling phones and devices that included the Google Android operating system. The jury found that TCL infringed claims 1 and 5, that TCL’s infringement was willful, and awarded…
Administrative Law Judge at ITC Denies Motion to Compel Non-Parties to Produce Compilations of Prior Art on Grounds that such Compilations Constitute Work Product
Feit Electric Company and Feit Electric Company, Inc. (collectively, “Feit”) filed a motion to enforce a subpoena for documents to non-parties Amerlux, LLC and Amerlux Exterior, LLC (collectively, “Amerlux”). The complainant in the ITC proceeding, Philips Lighting North America Corp. and Philips Lighting Holding B.V. (collectively, “Philips”) asserted U.S. Patent…
Special Master Recommends Deposition of Litigation Counsel Who Also Helped Prosecute Patents-in-Suit
The plaintiff filed a motion for protective order to prevent the deposition of its litigation counsel. The district court referred the motion for protective order to the special master for resolution. The special master framed the issue as whether, plaintiff’s litigation counsel, Mr. Chae should be required to provide testimony…
Fiduciary Obligation as Shareholder May Bar Challenge to Validity of Patent
GemShares LLC filed a patent infringement action against Arthur Lipton and Secured Worldwide, LLC (SWW) on U.S. Patent No. 8,706,513 B2 (the ‘513 patent). The ‘513 patent is entitled “global investment grade for natural and synthetic gems used in financial investments and commercial trading and method of creating standardized baskets…
Serving Responses to Contention Interrogatories Just before Discovery Cut-Off Justifies Sanctions
In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Bal Seal Engineering, Inc. (“Bal Seal”) filed a joint stipulation pursuant to Local 37-2 moving to compel Defendant and Counterclaimant Nelson Products, Inc. (“NPI”) to provide further responses to Bal Seal’s Interrogatories. These included contention interrogatories (the “Contention Interrogatories”) seeking “all facts”…