Close

Articles Posted in N.D. California

Updated:

Apple v. Samsung: Samsung’s Argument Regarding Juror Misconduct Insufficient to Justify a New Trial

After the jury returned a verdict in Apple’s favor for over $1 billion in damages, Samsung moved the district court for a new trial. Samsung’s based its motion on the argument that the jury foreperson gave dishonest answers during voir dire and that interviews he gave after the verdict demonstrated…

Updated:

Apple v. Samsung: Apple Loses Bid for Permanent Injunction against Samsung Because It Cannot Show Nexus Between Harm and Patented Features

Apple suffered yet another set back in the Smartphone wars, this time losing its motion for a permanent injunction against Samsung. The district court denied the permanent injunction primarily on the ground that Apple could not show irreparable harm that would result to Apple if an injunction did not issue.…

Updated:

Apple v. Samsung: Apple Is Ordered to Turn over Recent Settlement Agreement with HTC to Samsung Despite HTC’s Objections

After the recent global settlement between Apple and HTC, the terms of which Apple and HTC agreed to keep confidential, Samsung requested production of the agreement from Apple. Samsung moved to compel the production of the agreement. Samsung sought discovery of the agreement with HTC to support its opposition to…

Updated:

Brandywine v. Cisco: Motion to Dismiss Damage Claim Based on Inadequate Disclosures Denied But Plaintiff Ordered to Supplement With Information in Its Possession or Risk Preclusion

Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC (“Brandywine”) filed a patent infringement action against Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”). During the initial case management conference, the parties were given additional time to supplement their initial disclosures and were told to do so “on pain of preclusion.” Cisco contended that the damage disclosures remained inadequate…

Updated:

Apple v. Samsung: A Sign of Things to Come? Court Reduces Attorneys’ Fees for Both Apple and Samsung for Block Billing

The court previously awarded sanctions in the form of attorneys’ fees pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 to both Samsung and Apple based on various discovery motions. Apple and Samsung both filed applications for attorneys’ fees and then objected to each other’s applications. The court found the descriptions of the attorneys’ fees,…

Updated:

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd – Apple’s landslide victory over Samsung in a US District Court does not mark the end of the so called smart phone ‘patent wars’

This article was first published in Vol. 12, Issue 4 of E-Commerce Law Reports and is reprinted with permission. As the smart phone wars continue to rage across the world, the verdict in the Apple v. Samsung case is the latest battle to end, at least for now, in favor…

Updated:

Apple v. Samsung: Preliminary Injunction Stays in Effect Despite Jury Verdict Finding of Non-Infringement of Galaxy Tab 10.1

Before the patent trial between Apple and Samsung began, the district court issued a preliminary injunction against Samsung from making, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or importing into the United States, Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer. This preliminary injunction issued based on a finding…

Updated:

ESPN Loses Affirmative Defenses and Invalidity Counterclaim on Motion to Dismiss But Court Recognizes Unfairness in Allowing “Bare-Bones” Infringement Complaint While Prohibiting Defendants from Pleading Affirmative Defenses with Brevity

PageMelding filed a patent infringement action against ESPN asserting a patent that enables internet service and content providers to form mutually beneficial collaborations where website content is customized in accordance with those collaborations. PageMelding asserted that examples of infringement include, but are not limited to, ESPN3 and WatchESPN websites. After…

Updated:

Apple v. Samsung: Court Denies Samsung’s Motion for an Adverse Jury Instruction Because Samsung Waited for “Months and Months” and Only Sought the Instruction During Trial

The epic patent battle between Apple and Samsung has proved taxing not only for the lawyers and the parties in the case, but also for the judicial system as well. In a recent decision by the Magistrate Judge handling many of the discovery issues in the case, the court pointed…

Updated:

Apple v. Samsung: Samsung Moves to Preclude Apple from Commenting on Samsung’s Failure to Call Certain Witnesses at Trial

As the patent trial between Samsung and Apple continues, Samsung moved to preclude Apple from either eliciting testimony or attorney comment on Samsung’s failure to call certain witnesses to testify at trial. In its motion, Samsung asserted that permitting such testimony would be prejudicial and would be inappropriate because the…

Contact Us