Close

Articles Posted in District Courts

Updated:

HP’s “Stunning” and “Arrogant” Restrictions on Plaintiff’s Expert Denied Where HP Sought to Preclude Expert from Working in Similar Field or Against HP for Several Years After Trial

In a patent infringement action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, one of the defendants, Hewlett-Packard (“HP”) moved for a protective order with respect to the designation of one of plaintiff’s experts. Plaintiff contended that HP infringed certain patents held by plaintiff by making…

Updated:

Continuing Infringement Justifies Award of Supplemental Damages

ActiveVideo filed a patent infringement action against several Verizon entities asserting that Verizon infringed certain of ActiveVideo’s patents. After a three week jury trial, the jury found that Verizon infringed asserted claims of four of the patents and awarded ActiveVideo $115,000,000 in damages. After the verdict, ActiveVideo sought an award…

Updated:

Sanctions Awarded Against Teva Pharmaceuticals for Continuing to Press Inequitable Conduct Defense and Counterclaim After Therasense

Pfizer filed a patent infringement action against Teva Pharmaceuticals (“Teva”) over a patent that claims the use of certain chemical compounds claimed as a method to treat erectile dysfunction. During the case, Teva filed a motion to amend its answer and counterclaims to alleged a defense and counterclaim for inequitable…

Updated:

The Battle Over Android Continues: Google Succeeds in Striking Part of Oracle’s Expert Report

In August 2011, Google filed a motion to strike portions of the opening and reply expert reports of Oracle’s expert on patent infringement. Google argued that much of the report was not supported by Oracle’s infringement contentions as required by the Northern District of California’s local patent rules. The district…

Updated:

Failure to Offer Evidence of Acceptable Non-Infringing Alternatives in Summary Judgment Precludes Later Offer at Trial

Plaintiff filed a patent infringement action and subsequently filed a partial motion for summary judgment. In the partial motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff contended that there were no acceptable and available, non-infringing alternatives to the claimed inventions during the relevant damage period. The district court granted the motion. Prior…

Updated:

Inducing Infringement Claims Dismissed Where Plaintiff Failed to Allege Intentional Inducement

Plaintiff sued defendant for patent infringement for direct and indirect infringement for the commercial sale and/or use of the defendant’s asset tracking solutions product. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the ground that plaintiff failed to identify an infringing instrumentality and also failed to allege…

Updated:

Apple and Samsung Preliminary Injunction Battle Heats Up As Court Rules on Discovery Dispute

The ongoing patent battles between Apple and Samsung continue to pick up speed and show no signs of slowing down anytime soon. During the summer, Apple filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on certain of its patents and the district court ordered limited initial discovery for the topics raised…

Updated:

Patent Exhaustion Leads to Dismissal of Video Compression Patents Alleged Against Certain DirecTV Products

Multimedia Patent Trust (“MPT”) filed a patent infringement action against several defendants, including DirecTV and Vizio, which alleged infringement of multiple patents related to video compression technology. DirecTV and Vizio answered the complaint an alleged affirmative defenses of patent exhaustion and license. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment…

Updated:

Despite Therasense’s Heightened Standard, Another Inequitable Conduct Claim Survives Summary Judgment

It appears that the announced death of inequitable conduct claims may have been premature. As described below, yet another court allowed such claims to survive summary judgment. A court in the Northern District of Illinois denied summary judgment on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment of no unenforceability. Citing the…

Updated:

Multiple Defendants Dismissed Based on Improper Joinder

In a ruling that is likely to become more and more common after the passage of the America Invents Act, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all but one of the defendants in a patent infringement action for improper joinder. In February 2010, the…

Contact Us